They think that marriage is a privilege for straight couples, not a right for all couples. They think that by allowing you to marry a man like women can, that bestiality and polygamy will come into the picture.
Civil marriage is a legal contract. It is granted by the courts. Religious marriage is granted by a religious institution, like a church. A legal contract cannot discriminate.
As far as this conservative (Libertarian) is concerned, any consenting adult can marry any other consenting adult or adults and it’s none of my business.
I believe in the separation of church and state. Marriage should not be a U.S. government affair. After the fall of Rome, the Catholic church performed marriages. Even royalty had to succumb to the wishes of the Church. One man, King Henry VIII of England, decided to create an alternative church, the Church of England, which is headed by the royalty of England. The marriage laws of the United States came from the Church of England in the form of the government of England which is the same thing there.
My definition is the literal joining of the souls between a man and a woman. There is no separation of those souls from divorce and the reason why it’s adultery to remarry after divorce unless one spouse died. What the U.S. government has done is add an unwritten domestic contract (which gets bashed about in divorce court if there is no prenuptial agreement). I believe that’s what the government should be pitching except they should be written out and they should be calling it for what it is, a domestic contract, and not marriage.
If conservatives truly believed in the Constitution then gay marriage would be a moot issue.
Was that you holding the shotgun?
They think that marriage is a privilege for straight couples, not a right for all couples. They think that by allowing you to marry a man like women can, that bestiality and polygamy will come into the picture.
Civil marriage is a legal contract. It is granted by the courts. Religious marriage is granted by a religious institution, like a church. A legal contract cannot discriminate.
I dont care if you marry someone of the same sex as you. Gay people have every right to be unhappy like straight couples
I support the gays and I hope one day a gay joins the Military OPENLY gay.
Bless you gays.
Lol, you dont seem like a gay guy in ur pic.
Its like saying, how come im poor, my job is cleaning rich ppl’s mercedes, but i cant have a mercedes?
marriage is a covenant between man woman and God
created by God
and
you want to twist Gods word
homosexuality is just an urge
say no, and seek Gods will for your life
I fully support your right to marry whomever you wish so long that person is a consenting adult.
You didn’t pan my wedding, so I’m off the hook.
As far as this conservative (Libertarian) is concerned, any consenting adult can marry any other consenting adult or adults and it’s none of my business.
Last time I looked, it wasn’t only Conservatives who voted the measure down in every state every time it went to referendum.
I believe in the separation of church and state. Marriage should not be a U.S. government affair. After the fall of Rome, the Catholic church performed marriages. Even royalty had to succumb to the wishes of the Church. One man, King Henry VIII of England, decided to create an alternative church, the Church of England, which is headed by the royalty of England. The marriage laws of the United States came from the Church of England in the form of the government of England which is the same thing there.
My definition is the literal joining of the souls between a man and a woman. There is no separation of those souls from divorce and the reason why it’s adultery to remarry after divorce unless one spouse died. What the U.S. government has done is add an unwritten domestic contract (which gets bashed about in divorce court if there is no prenuptial agreement). I believe that’s what the government should be pitching except they should be written out and they should be calling it for what it is, a domestic contract, and not marriage.